In reviewing the case of Munja Bakehouse Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 6, two divergent business valuation opinions were brought before the court, each reflecting different approaches to the valuation of Munja’s shares. The court had the challenging task of determining which valuation provided the most reliable reflection of the business’s worth. On one side was Mr. G, representing the defendants, and on the other, Mr. S, acting for the plaintiffs. While both experts employed EBITDA as a primary metric, the court ultimately favoured Mr. G’s valuation due to its stronger alignment with the specific circumstances of the business.
Read More